A Battle for India’s soul
As reported in Amr Ujala 29 May 2014
The
rejection of the UPA is being interpreted as the rejection of secularism
and welfarism. This is a misreading of the message of the voters. In the
puzzling arithmetic of India’s first-past-the-post election system, only one in
three voters backed the winning side, whereas two voted against it. Who are the
winners of the 2014 elections, who voted for the ascendant political formation
and who celebrate its conquest as their own? They include not just large
numbers o f India’s urban middle and upper classes-its influential
cheerleaders-but also people Narendra Modi describes and the ‘neo-middle class’
or the aspirational class: Those who have not yet entered the middle class, but
are hopeful, impatient and ambitious to benefit from India’s growth story,
dreaming of well-paid jobs, plastic cards, bulging shopping-bags and mounting
EMIs. Many among these are first –time voters, between 18 & 22 years. The
third and most decisive support has been of a unified and significant
recruitment even from the subaltern castes.
Who then are the losers of this election, the two
in three voters who opposed the victorious political formation? There is first
the secular India; an anguished friend wrote to me that she hoped history would
forgive us for what we have become. The second set of losers are India’s
minorities, a especially Muslims but also Christians, who are stunned and
frightened by the scale of majortarian consolidation, unmatched even by the
aftermath of Partition and the demolition of the Babri Masjid, the two lowest
points in communal relations in independent India. Muslim friend’s confessed to
have wept when they heard the result. The third set of losers are India’s very
poor people-footloose migrant workers, landless farm labourers, forest dwellers
displaced from their depleting forests, farmers driven to despair and suicide, weavers
and artisans threatened to extinction, and women in unpaid or under-paid work,
over 2000 million people who still sleep hungry, over 100 million people
condemned to the squalor of slums, young people for whom each health emergency
is a catastrophe which pushes them further into penury. These forgotten exiles
from hope are also exiles from the triumphs and promises of this election.
Many also interpret the election mandate as the
death knell of the idea of welfare and social protection. In the development
model on offer, the State will encourage private investment and pull back or
direct State interventions for good-quality universal government schools and
health centers, direct job creation and nutrition. But India’s high-growth
years threw up few jobs. The experience of no country in the world demonstrates
that the health and educational needs of poor households can be met adequately
by private profit-let enterprises instead of the State. Ideologies centered on
majoritarian domination and the individualist material progress may have won
this round of battle. But the larger battle for the hearts and minds of our
young people must and will be won in the end by the ideas of justice,
solidarity, public compassion and reason. I am convinced that today’s masses of
losers are ultimately-in the battle for the soul of India-on the right side of
history.
Extract of an article
by Harsh Mandher HT May 20, 2014
jktuhfr vkSj cktkj ds fj”rs (A comparision of last five Govt’s- The economic indicators are worth noting.
ns”k dh fofHkUu ljdkjksa us fodkl ds nkos fd, gSA exj dSlh jgh
fiNyh ikap ljdjksa ds nkSjku cktkj vkSj vFkZo;oLFkk dh fLFkfr\
uke
|
GDP
|
CAD
|
Sensex rise
|
ihoh
ujflagjko
|
5.7%
|
9.6%
|
23.4%
|
,p
Mh nsoxkSM+k
|
6.1%
|
4.5%
|
2.3%
|
banz
dqekj xqtjky
|
4.3%
|
4.4%
|
0.6%
|
vVy
fcgkjh cktisbZ
|
5.9%
|
4.9%
|
4.3%
|
eueksgu
flag
|
7.9%
|
6.2%
|
16%
|
As reported in Amr Ujala 29 May 2014