Sunday, December 30, 2012

Films sanctify pestering and talking of women

31 December 2012
Films sanctify pestering and talking of women

The ghastly assault and rape of female paramedic in Delhi has produced an avalanche of protest and comment on why we treat women so badly. But a major cause, the film industry, has hardly been mentioned. It has fostered thoroughly retrograde male attitudes that tare at least partly responsible.

Some feminists focus on the commodification of women in Bollywood’s “item numbers”, sex-laden dances by Isha Koppilar, Mallia Sherawat and others. Others highlight the popularity of rape scenes to titillate audiences. Old –time villain Ranjeet did close to 100 rape scenes, with the audience almost cheering him on.

I don’t see films in other India languages. Some say they are even cruder, so let’s not blame Bollywood along. I’m told such crudity doesn’t happen in big Bollywood films any more. Really? I saw Rockstar, in which Ranbir Kapoor forces his attentions on a girl, who initially resists but then asks him to take her to a raunchy film!

Let the last word come from somebody in the film business. “There are films in which romantic wooing has been replaced by a kind of harassment of the heroine. The heroes of these films could be considered stalkers in some civil societies. Now imagine that this actor is a role model to millions….wouldn’t his fans think this behaviour is okay? Now imagine that this actress is a role model to millions….what message does it send to women across the country?.”

(An extract of an article published in TOI dated 30 Dec. 2012
by Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar)

Comments and opinion:

This is one of the reasons for degradation of women’s status in India. The brutal rape of “Damini” on 16 Dec in Delhi has caused the biggest upheaval in the country. There are many other social evils in the society. We need to thoroughly examine such short comings in our “social structure and social behaviors and come out with long term measures to enhance women’s status and finally the women’s, security. 

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Fact File: FDI & The Politics

Fact File: FDI & The Politics                                                                                    10 Dec. 2012
All those who had opposed FDI in retail must now respect the verdict and move on

It has been one of the most divisive issues in recent times and one which brought Parliament to a standstill several times much to the dismay of the public. Now at last, one contentious issue has been resolved with the Lok Sabha vote going the government’s way with 253 voting against the BJP’s motion seeking the withdrawal of the government’s decision to have 51% FDI in multi-brand retail. There were 218 votes in favor of the motion in a House of 471. Of course, there was all the drama and emotion we have come to associate with debates on such controversial issues. But at least all sides were heard and a vote taken. The government had resisted the vote but finally gave in owing to persistent demands from the Opposition. Clearly the Congress has done its political management well. With the BSP and the SP walking out before the vote, the government sailed through.

The BJP certainly put up a good fight with the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj, who moved the motion, making a fierce pitch against FDI in retail. But the BJP was always on somewhat shaky ground given that long ago and far away it had actually supported FDI in retail. In addition, its apprehensions that foreign companies coming into multi-brand retail will source their products from outside seem unfounded given past experience. But the more important point is that we have always demanded a level-playing field in international commerce and trade. Indian companies have taken over foreign businesses, the prominent among them being Jaguar Land Rover by the Tatas. Indians have taken over prized hotels and invested in several other areas abroad. The Indian economy is robust enough to withstand what many political parties seem to think is the ‘threat’ of FDI in retail. If they think that the Indian farmer is going to be ‘enslaved’, as one speaker put it, or will be driven out of business, we could well ask what out political worthies have done to make our agriculture more competitive and technologically efficient.

The arguments in favour of FDI in retail are far more persuasive than those against it. As one speaker put it, the decision can always be reversed if it is found that it is affecting local businesses and farmers in an adverse manner. Now that the vote is over, all parties must move forward and deal with the many legislation pending before Parliament. Enough time has been expended on this issue at the cost of other crucial matters which have a far more significant impact on the lives of millions of Indians. The commerce minister has said that this decision was taken after consulting all stakeholders. He has outlined the many benefits, including a drastic reduction in wastage of food that will accrue from this decision. Now that it has been decided upon in the august house, it is incumbent on those who were opposed to it to respect this. This would be true democracy in action.

Not only that some of the observations in the press our worth noting and referred to:

·        “Our opposition seem to have made a habit of “blind opposition”, to what our Govt wants to implement. When the leftist (Marxist) oppose they project as they are the biggest savior of the down trodden. When they support the project as they are the biggest revolutionaries.
·        The opposition does a misinformation campaign as when “Mal Mart” would come to India they would bring an army of white skinned people and take over the reins of India as the “East India Company” did.

Not telling the people.

(a)   They would make substantial investment 
(b)   This would generate a great deal of economic activity
(c)    New techniques and practices would fructify existing norms to modernity.
(d)   Healthy competition would bring   in better customer service. We have seen in Banking, Insurance, and in some selected consumer goods (Cars specially)
(e)   Shashi Shekhar says- “Politician by their utterances spread fear, lawlessness divisiveness just to derive political benefits.

Let us not forget the 1990-91when our economy was at-its worst. The preceding non congress govts (VP Singh, Charan Singh, and Chandra Shekhar) had pawned the country to the global markets, It was Dr. Manmohan singh with his astute economic vision put the country on the right path of liberalization and brought it parallelely to global economy. Opening up the “Retail” for FDI is a bold step and would yield handsome results.